Cask Tales

Cask Tales v Jim Murray

Cask Tales v Jim Murray

This is a short post, really by way of an update to one a few months ago. When we reviewed Jim Murray’s Whisky Bible 2012(an invaluable addition to the whisky-lover’s bookshelf, by the way), we produced a little chart to examine the correlation between our opinions on whiskies.

In short, there was none.

(In long, there is actually a slight positive correlation, with a coefficient of determination of 0.1021, suggesting that – in a purely statistical sense – about 10% of the mark we give a whisky could be predicted by knowing the mark that Jim Murray gave it. Or, to put it another way, telling you absolutely nothing, other than that we don’t agree particularly much. See why I kept it short?)

Of course, this tells you nothing more than that opinions on whisky are highly subjective, and serves no purpose other than to highlight our love of absurd statistics and obsessive nature. Go and pour yourself a drink; it’s clearly about time we did…

This entry was written by Josh and published on August 22, 2012 at 20.54. It’s filed under Blog and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post.

4 thoughts on “Cask Tales v Jim Murray

  1. Pingback: And the winner is… « Cask Tales

  2. Pingback: Jim Murray’s whisky innuendos « Cask Tales

  3. Pingback: The best is yet to come – Ballantine’s Finest « Cask Tales

  4. Pingback: The best whiskies in the world | Cask Tales

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: